The deep vision or the underground thinking

Often, within the hundreds of mails I get every month, someone asked me why having a clear vision of what he wants, this is not progressing and nothing seems to move towards their wishes. Perhaps the Wattles science is not working? What could be happening? Why nothing seems to materialize according to our wishes?

The answer is simple. Most people, not all, believe they want something that they think consciously. The conscious mind is our conscience, so is what we reach to see ourselves. But this is only the tip of an iceberg. Our mind is much more than this, and is in “underground” on our conscience. Beneath our consciousness seems to have, according to what is described by Mr Freud hundred years ago. a mind and a sub-consciousness mind and unconscious mind.

I am not a scientist and I have no elements to judge whether Mr. Freud was right or not, but clearly knew that at least a very high percentage of our mind moves deep in places, which we did not even suspect. We see only the tip of the iceberg, the part to which we have access. And if our mind is not in line with our wishes, the fraction can hardly make conscious movements to the universe and the things that must move to fulfill our true desires. Or could be contradictory and may even be cancelled.

Under our conscience our mind thinks permanently, and send messages to other things, and the knowingly substance. But nothing stops when our conscience takes a breath, for example during sleep. Our mind is still living, working, and our spirit continues awake and sending messages to the rest of the universe.

Therefore it is important to align our spirit and appreciation, perhaps our most powerful weapon, with our conscious mind, our desires or visions of what we want to be, do, or have to live. How is this done? That is the subject of another article, but in principle the only weapon in our possession is our spirit. Learning to master it is to learn to create for us. It is learning to be god.

For now, suffice is to say that this is the mechanism by which our conscious desires can be nullified by another mind, also ours, which makes us wreck. And that is why we believe that the science does not work.

To be rich is the opposite of being poor?

This is a clear example of how the culture, the language and the concepts deceive to us. To be poor is not to be able to fulfil our basic necessities. To be rich is not the opposite, so that to fulfil ours basic necessities only transforms to us into people of middle-class, very far from being rich. The statistics that each government makes demonstrate that in each country there are many families who cover their basic necessities and at at the same time there are very few rich ones.

Why this error of concepts appears, in which what seems to be the opposed thing is not really the opposite thing?

It is produce by the facti that the poverty does not exist, in a practical sense. The wealth yes. One cannot have poverty, is something intangible, is a quality, is not an object. Nevertheless the wealth is an object, is measurable, quantifiable, it is measured in dollars or houses or cars or in… There are many forms to measure the wealth actually. The poverty is simply a quality, the one of not reaching to cover the basic necessities with feeding, house, clothes, education and others.

And what are the consequences of this fundamental difference?

Beacuase the poverty, being a quality or a condition, has much better press than the wealth. To the poor men in some countries everything is allowed, including the crime, by its own condition of poor men. The rich ones are punished in any case, considering them bad people by the only fact of being rich, persecuting them in different forms, in almost all the countries. And are crime suspicions or Mafia organized is believed like origin of its fortune.

And what other consequences exist?

They are many. There are governments that opress the masses with the pretext to defend the poor men, and other governments who tolerate crimes or foment them with the pretext of defending the freedom of people. Those that say to defend the poor men make them poorer, whereas those who say to defend the freedom, still put below all the liberties the freedom of commerce, confusing the population.

What we would have to change?

Only our mind. If a rich one made fortune with legal means and their own capacity, is worthy of admiration, emulation and respect. If a rich one made its fortune with no legal means, he is gangster like those which robs to eat. We have to make an agreement in the society in what is crime is crime, and criminals are criminals no matter if are rich or poor. Of course the poor man can have excuses in front of a judge, but it does not stop being a delinquent. When the entire world understands this law, will be more rich people and and less poor ones.